MBA, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, NYU, USA
Master of Science, Sloan School of Management, MIT, USA
MBA from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Law Degree LLB from Manchester University, England
Passed the Solicitors Finals Examinations from the College of Law, Law Society of England and Wales (with Honours)
Passed the Overseas Lawyers Qualification Examination, Hong Kong Law Society
Bachelor of Science(First-class Honours),University of Singapore (now National University of Singapore), Singapore
Master of Science in Engineering, University of Wisconsin, USA
Diploma in Business Administration, University of Singapore (now National University of Singapore), Singapore
Master of Science in Business Administration, California State University, Long Beach, U.S.A.
Bachelor of Commerce, Soochow University, Taiwan
EMBA, National Taiwan University
Master in Economics, Soochow University, Taiwan
Master Degree in International Affairs, NCCU
Ph.D., Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, R.O.C.
According to the "Procedures for Election of Directors and Supervisors" promulgated by Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation on January 28, 2015, the shareholders meeting of the Company established "the Rules Governing the Election of Directors" on May 27, 2016. In accordance with Article 3 of the aforementioned rules, the composition of the board of directors should take into account its diversity, and there should be a diversified guideline as to its operation and development, including, but not limited to: (1) gender, age, nationality, and culture background; and(2) expertise (such as law, accounting, business, finance, marketing and technology), skills, and experience. Such provision is also specified in Article 20, Corporate Governance Best-Practice Principles. The aforementioned two Rules and Principles have been published on the webpage of the Company.
(CompanyRules)
In order to implement the diversity policy of the Board members, the percentage of inside directors to all of the Board members is 33% and the independent director is 44%. The percentage of female board members is 11%. From the aspect of the age of Board members, three of the Board members are 70 years of age and above; four of them are between 60 and 70 years of age, and two of them are below 60 years of age. After the re-election at the 2023 annual shareholders' meeting, the backgrounds of the Board members manifest their diversity on various areas of expertise:
(1) expertise in business and management: Fong-Long Chen, Andre J.L. Koo, Chee Wee Goh, Hsiu Tze Cheng, Chih Yang Chen, Casey K. Tung, Steven Jeremy Goodman, Ching Shui Tsou and Hong Tzer Yang;
(2) expertise in finance: Fong-Long Chen, Andre J.L. Koo, Chee Wee Goh, Hsiu Tze Cheng, Chih Yang Chen, Casey K. Tung and Ching Shui Tsou;
(3) expertise in global communication & international relations: Chih Yang Chen.
(4) expertise in science and technology: Fong-Long Chen, Hong Tzer Yang and Chee Wee Goh.
(5) expertise in litigation and tax law, and law: Steven Jeremy Goodman.
(6) expertise in risk management: Fong-Long Chen, Andre J.L. Koo, Hsiu Tze Cheng, Chih Yang Chen and Steven Jeremy Goodman.
In terms of gender diversity, in addition to setting the company's goal of having at least one female director, the medium- and long-term goal is that the company and its subsidiaries have more than one-third of the company with female directors and supervisors. So far, all of the board members have achieved the goal of diversity policy.
1. Evaluation Period: From 2022/11/01 to 2023/10/31.
2. Period for Conducting the Evaluation: From 2023/11/01 to 2023/11/10.
3. Criteria for Evaluation
(1) Criteria for evaluating the performance of the Board of Directors as whole
i. Participation in the operation of the company;
ii. Improvement of the quality of the board of directors' decision making;
iii. Composition and structure of the board of directors;
iv. Election and continuing education of the directors; and
v. Internal control.
(2) Criteria for evaluating the performance of individual director
i. Familiarity with the goals and missions of the company;
ii. Awareness of the duties of a director;
iii. Participation in the operation of the company;
iv. Management of internal relationship and communication;
v. The director's expertise and continuing education; and
vi. Internal control.
(3) Criteria for evaluating the performance of Compensation Committee
i. Participation in the operation of the company;
ii. The awareness of the duties of a member of Compensation Committee;
iii. Improvement of the quality of the Compensation Committee’s decision making;
iv. Composition and selection and member election of Compensation Committee;and
v. Internal control.
(4) Criteria for evaluating the performance of Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee
i. Participation in the operation of the company;
ii. The awareness of the duties of a member of Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee;
iii. Improvement of the quality of the Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee’s decision making;
iv. Composition and selection and member election of Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee;and
v. Internal control.
(5) Criteria for evaluating the performance of Audit Committee
i. Participation in the operation of the company;
ii. The awareness of the duties of a member of Audit Committee;
iii. Improvement of the quality of the Audit Committee;
iv. Composition and selection and member election of Audit Committee; and
v. Internal control.
(6) Criteria for evaluating the performance of Risk Management Committee.
i. Participation in the operation of the company;
ii. The awareness of the duties of a member of Risk Management Committee;
iii. Improvement of the quality of the Risk Management Committee;
iv. Composition and selection and member election of Risk Management Committee;and
v. Internal control.
4. Internal Board Performance Evaluation Execution Team
The following members of Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee were appointed on August 29, 2023, by the Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee to perform the Board Performance Evaluation of 2023:
(1) All incumbent directors;
(2) Mr. Ying-Chih Liao, Corporate Governance Officer;
(3) Mr. Charles Yang, Audit Officer; and
(4) Mrs. Betsy Sun, Legal Officer.
5. Evaluation Results of the Board of Directors
Criteria | Result |
---|---|
1. Participation in the operation of the company | Exceeding the Standard |
2. Improvement of the quality of the board of directors' decision making | Exceeding the Standard |
3. Composition and structure of the board of directors | Exceeding the Standard |
4. Election and continuing education of the directors | Exceeding the Standard |
5. Internal control | Exceeding the Standard |
6. Individual Director Performance Evaluation
The evaluation found that each director perform exceeds the Standard in every aspect of the criteria for evaluating the performance of individual director.
Criteria | Result |
---|---|
1. The familiarity with the goals and missions of the company | Exceeding the Standard |
2. The awareness of the duties of a director | Exceeding the Standard |
3. The participation in the operation of the company | Exceeding the Standard |
4. Management of internal relationship and communication | Exceeding the Standard |
5. The director's expertise and continuing education | Exceeding the Standard |
6. Internal Control | Exceeding the Standard |
7. Evaluation Results of Compensation Committee
Criteria | Result |
---|---|
1. Participation in the operation of the company | Exceeding the Standard |
2. The awareness of the duties of a member of Compensation Committee | Exceeding the Standard |
3. Improvement of the quality of the Compensation Committee’s decision making | Exceeding the Standard |
4. Composition and selection and member election of Compensation Committee | Exceeding the Standard |
5. Internal Control | Exceeding the Standard |
8. Evaluation Results of Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee
Criteria | Result |
---|---|
1. Participation in the operation of the company | Exceeding the Standard |
2. The awareness of the duties of a member of Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee | Exceeding the Standard |
3. Improvement of the quality of the Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee’s decision making | Exceeding the Standard |
4. Composition and selection and member election of Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee | Exceeding the Standard |
5. Internal Control | Exceeding the Standard |
9. Evaluation Results of Audit Committee
Criteria | Result |
---|---|
1. Participation in the operation of the company | Exceeding the Standard |
2. The awareness of the duties of a member of Audit Committee | Exceeding the Standard |
3. Improvement of the quality of the Audit Committee’s decision making | Exceeding the Standard |
4. Composition and selection and member election of Audit Committee | Exceeding the Standard |
5. Internal Control | Exceeding the Standard |
10. Evaluation Results of Risk Management Committee
Criteria | Result |
---|---|
1. Participation in the operation of the company | Exceeding the Standard |
2. The awareness of the duties of a member of Risk Management Committee | Exceeding the Standard |
3. Improvement of the quality of the Risk Management Committee’s decision making | Exceeding the Standard |
4. Composition and selection and member election of Risk Management Committee | Exceeding the Standard |
5. Internal Control | Exceeding the Standard |
In accordance with “Regulations Governing Evaluation of the Performance of the Board of Directors”, the Company's external board performance evaluation shall be conducted by an external independent professional institution or a panel of external experts and scholars at least once every three years. In June 2023, the Company appointed Taiwan Corporate Governance Association to carry out the 2023 external board effectiveness evaluation. The evaluation period is from November 1, 2022 to October 31, 2023. This association and the executives are independent and have no business relationship with the Company. The association conducts overall observation and evaluation on the following eight aspects: the composition of the board of directors, guidance, authorization, supervision, communication, internal control and risk management, self-discipline of the board of directors, and other items such as the procedure of board meetings and the support systems. Taiwan Corporate Governance Association has issued the evaluation report on December 4, 2023. The Company intends to submit the general comments and suggestions issued by the associations and the expected measures to the Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee and the Board of Directors on March 27, 2024.
1. The Company expressly reflects its endeavor to promote corporate governance and ESG by ranking in top 5% in the Corporate Governance Evaluation, and as a DJSI constituent for several years. It also shows that the Board’s supervision regarding sustainable development is effective.
2. The Company shows its ambition to enhance the Board’s performance not only by engaging external institution to conduct the Board Evaluation three times but also by formulating and implementing the improvement plans for previous suggestions from the external institution.
3. In order to enhance the execution of Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee, the Company forms the ESG Executive Committee to assist the Board in developing the Company’s critical strategy and combining ESG in its operation, such as providing better interest rates to a client who has good ESG performance and thus having positive influence to the society.
4. The Compensation Committee assists the Board in examining the performance of the directors and executives, and the policy, criteria, and structure of the compensation. The Company incorporates ESG Indicator in executives’ performance which could stimulate the team’s morale, and, thus as a cornerstone of sustainable development.
The Audit Department is under the Board, and the Chairman assesses Chief Audit Officer’s performance. In order to further enhance the independence of internal audit and the Audit Committee’s supervision, it is advised that the Audit Committee participate in reviewing Chief Audit Officer’s work plan and performance, or provide opinions on the same.
The Audit Committee consists of all Independent Directors. The Company ensures the independence of internal audit by having a clear communication channel between the member of the Committee and the Chief Audit Officer. The internal audit is well-supervised by the Audit Committee. The member of Audit Committee will issue opinion on the audit report, and will timely ask Chief Audit Officer questions related to the audit report during the meeting.
Pursuant to“Regulations Governing Evaluation of the Performance of the Board of Directors” , the Company conducts internal board evaluation every year. It is advised that the Company incorporate the index by referencing the work scope of each functional committee to make the internal evaluation more distinguishable.
The Company will add the index for the specific functional committee to make the internal evaluation more distinguishable.
The report channels are set forth in the “Ethical Corporate Management Best Practice Principles” and “Whistle-Blower Policy”, and the Audit Department and HR Department will handle the case depending on the nature of the report information. Currently, Independent Director will receive the report information if the reporting matters related to directors or executives. It is advised that the Company to establish a reliable communication channel to let the Independent Director could timely receive the report information, and, thus enhancing the connection between the whistle blower mechanic and the Board.
According to the “Ethical Corporate Management Best Practice Principles” and “Whistle-Blower Policy”, when the nature of reported case related to a material violation or will have a material adverse effect, the Company shall timely report it to the Independent Director, and report the consequence of the same to the Board. The Company will integrate aforementioned content to the “Whistle-Blower Policy” to make it more comprehensive.
Major Resolutions of Board Meetings